Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore/release-3.2.9 #617

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

chore/release-3.2.9 #617

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

SafetyQuincyF
Copy link
Collaborator

@SafetyQuincyF SafetyQuincyF commented Oct 23, 2024

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor
  • Other (please describe):
  • Version Release

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a pull request template for better contribution guidelines.
    • Enhanced support for development containers.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved internal server errors and safety errors related to unauthenticated scans.
    • Added clarifications regarding vulnerabilities found during scans.
    • Implemented a warning for deprecated check arguments.
  • Chores

    • Updated changelog to reflect changes in version 3.2.9.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@SafetyQuincyF has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78a75de and 2d6631c.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates for version 3.2.9, including changes in the CHANGELOG.md and the safety/VERSION file. The changelog now documents various changes categorized as "chore," "feat," and "fix," featuring a deprecation message for the license command, a new pull request template, and improvements to devcontainer support. Additionally, fixes for internal server errors and safety errors are noted. The version number in the safety/VERSION file has been incremented from 3.2.8 to 3.2.9.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Updated to include version 3.2.9 with entries for "chore," "feat," and "fix," including deprecation messages and new features.
safety/VERSION Version updated from 3.2.8 to 3.2.9.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore/release-3.2.8 #606: The changes in the changelog for version 3.2.8 are related to the updates made in the changelog for version 3.2.9, as both PRs involve documenting version releases and their respective changes.
  • fix/clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ #608: The enhancements to the reporting functionality of vulnerabilities in the scanning process may relate to the fixes documented in the changelog for version 3.2.9, particularly regarding clarifications on vulnerabilities found.

Suggested reviewers

  • dylanpulver

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With version 3.2.9, we brighten the day!
Changelog updated, new features in sight,
Bugs fixed and templates, oh what a delight!
Let's celebrate changes, with hops and with cheer,
For every new version, brings us all near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@SafetyQuincyF SafetyQuincyF added enhancement Suggests an improvement or new feature. and removed enhancement Suggests an improvement or new feature. labels Oct 23, 2024
@dylanpulver
Copy link
Collaborator

Let's merge the fix in first to get the tests passing and then this one after @SafetyQuincyF

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

11-17: Improve consistency in changelog entries

Some entries have inconsistent formatting:

  • Extra spaces (line 11: "fix: devcontainer")
  • Inconsistent use of slashes (line 15: "clarify-vulnerabilities-found/")
  • Incomplete sentences (line 15: ends abruptly with "where the vulnerabilities")

Consider standardizing the format:

-fix:  devcontainer fix (be42d8e)
+fix: devcontainer fix (be42d8e)
-fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07bc5b7)
+fix: clarify vulnerabilities found in scan results (07bc5b7)
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b21f3a and 78a75de.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • safety/VERSION (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • safety/VERSION
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md

[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

8-17: Consider adding more descriptive details to changelog entries

Some entries would benefit from more detailed descriptions to help users understand the changes:

  • What was fixed in the devcontainer?
  • What specific internal server error was fixed?
  • What deprecation warning was added for check arguments?

Let's verify if we can find more context about these changes:

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

@@ -5,6 +5,17 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is partly based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html) and [PEP 440](https://peps.python.org/pep-0440/)

## [3.2.9] - 2024-10-23
- chore: deprection-message-for-license-command (4149b70)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in changelog entry

There's a typo in "deprection" which should be "deprecation".

-chore: deprection-message-for-license-command (4149b70)
+chore: deprecation-message-for-license-command (4149b70)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- chore: deprection-message-for-license-command (4149b70)
- chore: deprecation-message-for-license-command (4149b70)

@SafetyQuincyF SafetyQuincyF merged commit d77fec0 into main Oct 24, 2024
10 checks passed
@SafetyQuincyF SafetyQuincyF deleted the chore/release-3.2.9 branch October 24, 2024 22:24
This was referenced Oct 25, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants