-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore/release-3.2.9 #617
chore/release-3.2.9 #617
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@SafetyQuincyF has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates for version 3.2.9, including changes in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Let's merge the fix in first to get the tests passing and then this one after @SafetyQuincyF |
32b88b0
to
78a75de
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
11-17
: Improve consistency in changelog entriesSome entries have inconsistent formatting:
- Extra spaces (line 11: "fix: devcontainer")
- Inconsistent use of slashes (line 15: "clarify-vulnerabilities-found/")
- Incomplete sentences (line 15: ends abruptly with "where the vulnerabilities")
Consider standardizing the format:
-fix: devcontainer fix (be42d8e) +fix: devcontainer fix (be42d8e) -fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07bc5b7) +fix: clarify vulnerabilities found in scan results (07bc5b7)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- safety/VERSION (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- safety/VERSION
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
8-17
: Consider adding more descriptive details to changelog entriesSome entries would benefit from more detailed descriptions to help users understand the changes:
- What was fixed in the devcontainer?
- What specific internal server error was fixed?
- What deprecation warning was added for check arguments?
Let's verify if we can find more context about these changes:
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
@@ -5,6 +5,17 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file. | |||
The format is partly based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/), | |||
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html) and [PEP 440](https://peps.python.org/pep-0440/) | |||
|
|||
## [3.2.9] - 2024-10-23 | |||
- chore: deprection-message-for-license-command (4149b70) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix typo in changelog entry
There's a typo in "deprection" which should be "deprecation".
-chore: deprection-message-for-license-command (4149b70)
+chore: deprecation-message-for-license-command (4149b70)
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
- chore: deprection-message-for-license-command (4149b70) | |
- chore: deprecation-message-for-license-command (4149b70) |
78a75de
to
2d6631c
Compare
Type of Change
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores