Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[production/RRFS.v1] Update MYNN PBL & Smoke for RRFS.v1 #180

Merged

Conversation

haiqinli
Copy link
Collaborator

@haiqinli haiqinli commented Mar 5, 2024

  1. Update the MYNN PBL scheme for the RRFS.v1 code freeze.
  2. Update the Smoke modules for the RRFS.v1.
  3. Include the PR [production/RRFS.v1] fix zero cloud fraction for RRFS ensemble members  #186.

@grantfirl grantfirl changed the title Update MYNN PBL for RRFS.v1 [production/RRFS.v1] Update MYNN PBL for RRFS.v1 Mar 6, 2024
@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@haiqinli Please merge in the latest production/RRFS.v1 branch.

@haiqinli haiqinli changed the title [production/RRFS.v1] Update MYNN PBL for RRFS.v1 [production/RRFS.v1] Update MYNN PBL & Smoke for RRFS.v1 Mar 13, 2024
@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
!>\file rrfs_smoke_wrapper.F90
!>\file rrfs_smoke_wrapper.F90hwp_method
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm guessing that adding hwp_method is a mistake in this Doxygen comment?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@grantfirl Yes, it is a mistake. Fixed. Thanks.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@haiqinli What are your thoughts on combining #186 into this? Also, are you going to recreate the fv3atm PR?

@haiqinli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@grantfirl Yes, it is fine with me that combining #186 into this. Yes, I will recreate the fv3atm PR when the regression test is done. If we decide to combine #186 into this, I will merge it and redo the regression test.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@grantfirl Yes, it is fine with me that combining #186 into this. Yes, I will recreate the fv3atm PR when the regression test is done. If we decide to combine #186 into this, I will merge it and redo the regression test.

OK, let's do that. Please let me know if you need help. Also, when you create the fv3atm PR, be sure to include the changes in NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#801.

@haiqinli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@grantfirl Sure, I am starting to merge Jili's PR, and will let you know if I need your help. Thanks for coordinating these efforts.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@haiqinli Merge looks good. I'll close #186.

@haiqinli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@grantfirl Yes, #186 has been merged. Thanks.

@jkbk2004
Copy link

@MatthewPyle-NOAA @grantfirl @dustinswales tests are done at ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#2170. can you merge this pr?

@dustinswales dustinswales merged commit 85fabc0 into ufs-community:production/RRFS.v1 Mar 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@haiqinli haiqinli deleted the production/RRFS.v1-mynn branch May 24, 2024 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants