Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for WFMP-269, Support multiple deployments in the package goal #561

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jfdenise
Copy link
Contributor

@jfdenise jfdenise commented Sep 9, 2024

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFMP-269

Updated documentation for multiple deployments and Glow (that was missing).

@jfdenise jfdenise requested a review from jamezp as a code owner September 9, 2024 08:23
@jfdenise jfdenise force-pushed the multiple-deployments branch 2 times, most recently from e67c069 to 81bfc07 Compare September 9, 2024 09:27
@jfdenise jfdenise force-pushed the multiple-deployments branch from 81bfc07 to b37894f Compare September 10, 2024 08:58
@jfdenise
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jamezp I implemented your great comments. Thank-you!

@jfdenise
Copy link
Contributor Author

@torsten-liermann , it would be great if you could validate that this solution works for you. You have been the main source of requirement for it!
Thank-you.

@torsten-liermann
Copy link

torsten-liermann commented Sep 10, 2024

Thank you for the quick implementation. The implementation works as expected for the example project. I would have designed the idea similarly to the maven-ear-plugin: deploying all dependencies defined in the pom.xml and structuring the "deployments" configuration analogous to the "modules" configuration.

https://github.com/torsten-liermann/wildfly-multiapps

@jamezp
Copy link
Member

jamezp commented Nov 14, 2024

@jfdenise this needs a rebase

@jfdenise jfdenise force-pushed the multiple-deployments branch from b37894f to f134c4f Compare November 18, 2024 11:29
@jfdenise
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jamezp , done. Thank-you.

@jamezp
Copy link
Member

jamezp commented Dec 3, 2024

This was replaced by #604

@jamezp jamezp closed this Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants