feat: support Proteus federation if MLS not supported by backend (WPB-14456)

[yamilmedina]

WPB-14456 [Android] Still allow usage of federation for proteus in some cases

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

We need to support federation search, according to if MLS is enabled, or if it is configured or not in the backend.

Solutions

Create a new use case centralizing the logic to decide if we need to support federation or not for this: team/conversation/backend.

Before the logic was in the view model in AR, but here is centralized and we can test all the cases for it, therefore now the view model just calls this use case to decide if we need to enable cross domain search.

Dependencies (Optional)

A PR will follow in AR.

Needs releases with:

• feat: support Proteus federation if MLS not supported by backend (WPB-14250) kalium#3126

• GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

• I have added automated test to this contribution

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 44.94%. Comparing base (7720cdd) to head (7dd35e2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on release/candidate.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           release/candidate    #3668      +/-   ##
=====================================================
- Coverage              44.95%   44.94%   -0.02%     
=====================================================
  Files                    471      471              
  Lines                  15732    15725       -7     
  Branches                2690     2686       -4     
=====================================================
- Hits                    7073     7068       -5     
  Misses                  7901     7901              
+ Partials                 758      756       -2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...i/home/conversations/search/SearchUserViewModel.kt	97.29% <100.00%> (+2.23%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7720cdd...7dd35e2. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

Built wire-android-staging-compat-pr-3668.apk is available for download

[github-actions]

Built wire-android-staging-compat-pr-3668.apk is available for download

[github-actions]

Built wire-android-staging-compat-pr-3668.apk is available for download

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Built wire-android-staging-compat-pr-3668.apk is available for download