-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(astro): Exposes extra APIs for script and testing #12052
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: a94413b The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is blocked because it contains a minor
changeset. A reviewer will merge this at the next release if approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @Fryuni for kicking off this! I am going to block this PR for now, while we agreed on a plan on how to ship this new feature on Discord.
!preview test-apis |
Snapshots have been released for the following packages:
Publish Log
Build Log
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After the meeting we had, I am good now. Happy to merge it!
Co-authored-by: Matt Kane <[email protected]>
Should there be? 😅 |
@Fryuni what's the status of the PR? Considering this is a minor and we are exposing new APIs, I believe we should document them. Happy to help if needed. |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #12052 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
Coming back to this PR (finally). I opened Fryuni/inox-tools#203 updating the Previously we talked about testing it out on the adapters repo, but since they are now part of this repo I don't think that would be necessary. |
Just reminding @Fryuni to loop me in re: what might be required for docs! Just because something wasn't documented before doesn't mean it shouldn't have been... 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just quick changeset comments!
Co-authored-by: Sarah Rainsberger <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving for docs, with some nits below and additional "commentary" for your consideration @Fryuni ! I trust you to take it from here! 🫡
Also noting, to remind myself as much as anyone, I did not see any new error messages added to accompany this feature.
Concerns addressed
Co-authored-by: Sarah Rainsberger <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is blocked because it contains a minor
changeset. A reviewer will merge this at the next release if approved.
Changes
Testing
There was no change in logic. The behavior for all changed functions was already tested.
Docs
build
API should be updatedastro/config
, so nothing to update. The two functions newly exported would go in such a reference.