Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[22658] Reliable volatile change dropped when all history acked (backport #5606) #5615

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jan 30, 2025

When the entire history is acked in volatile, given that the entries are deleted from the history, check_acked_status satisfies min_low_mark >= get_seq_num_min() because seq_num_min is unknown. This makes try_remove to fail, because it tries to remove changes but there were none. This causes prepare_change to not perform the changes, since the history was full and could not delete any changes.

@Mergifyio backport 3.1.x 3.0.x 2.14.x 2.10.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.

  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.

  • Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally

  • N/A Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.

  • N/A Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)

  • Changes are backport compatible: they do NOT break ABI nor change library core behavior.

  • Changes are API compatible.

  • N/A New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).

  • N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.

  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • If this is a critical bug fix, backports to the critical-only supported branches have been requested.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #5606 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

@EugenioCollado
Copy link
Contributor

@Mergifyio rebase

* Refs #22658: Regression test

Signed-off-by: Juanjo Garcia <[email protected]>

* Refs #22658: Fix bug

Signed-off-by: Juanjo Garcia <[email protected]>

* Refs #22658: corrected failing CI

Signed-off-by: Juanjo Garcia <[email protected]>

* Refs #22658: Included reviewer suggestions

Signed-off-by: Juanjo Garcia <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Juanjo Garcia <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 90790ce)
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Feb 3, 2025

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado force-pushed the mergify/bp/2.14.x/pr-5606 branch from e2df968 to 8977954 Compare February 3, 2025 07:33
@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Feb 3, 2025
@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado self-requested a review February 3, 2025 07:35
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Collado <[email protected]>
@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado force-pushed the mergify/bp/2.14.x/pr-5606 branch from b444fea to c99ef7d Compare February 3, 2025 08:39
@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado added ci-pending PR which CI is running and removed ci-pending PR which CI is running labels Feb 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado merged commit bc53ad5 into 2.14.x Feb 4, 2025
18 checks passed
@EugenioCollado EugenioCollado deleted the mergify/bp/2.14.x/pr-5606 branch February 4, 2025 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci-pending PR which CI is running
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants