Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude empty requests in requests list #3998

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

jtraglia
Copy link
Member

specs/electra/validator.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jtraglia jtraglia mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2024
20 tasks
specs/electra/validator.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@ppopth ppopth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good after all

Comment on lines +145 to +147
| `DEPOSIT_REQUEST_TYPE` | `Bytes1('0x00')` |
| `WITHDRAWAL_REQUEST_TYPE` | `Bytes1('0x01')` |
| `CONSOLIDATION_REQUEST_TYPE` | `Bytes1('0x02')` |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For CL specs, they should be named with REQUEST_TYPE_*, but I figured out they are EIP constants... 😭

@lightclient is it too late to change?

etan-status and others added 4 commits November 21, 2024 23:58
Request hash is not considered in `compute_el_block_hash`, have to use
one of the other overloads for this to work.
Fix block hash computation for deposit transition tests
Request hash is not considered in `compute_el_block_hash`, have to use
one of the other overloads for this to work.
Copy link
Contributor

@etan-status etan-status left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cross-checked the block hashes in the test vectors against Nimbus. LGTM ✅

@jtraglia jtraglia merged commit 148ccca into ethereum:dev Nov 22, 2024
26 checks passed
@jtraglia jtraglia deleted the exclude-empty-requests branch November 22, 2024 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants