Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DevOverlay] Add Call Stack #74658

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

devjiwonchoi
Copy link
Member

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi commented Jan 8, 2025

This PR added style for Call Stack and applied the following:

  • Changed call stack rendering logic
    • Display the stack of the first frame
  • Removed unused CSS
  • Ported component CSS from the RuntimeError component to respecting components.

Light

CleanShot.2025-01-09.at.07.18.40.mp4

Dark

CleanShot.2025-01-09.at.07.20.34.mp4

Closes NDX-610

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 8, 2025

Tests Passed

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 8, 2025

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Increase detected ⚠️)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
buildDuration 36.6s 32.4s N/A
buildDurationCached 30.2s 27.1s N/A
nodeModulesSize 417 MB 417 MB ⚠️ +206 kB
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 942ms 823ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
5306-HASH.js gzip 53.3 kB 53.3 kB N/A
8276.HASH.js gzip 169 B 168 B N/A
8377-HASH.js gzip 5.44 kB 5.44 kB N/A
bccd1874-HASH.js gzip 53 kB 53 kB
framework-HASH.js gzip 57.5 kB 57.5 kB N/A
main-app-HASH.js gzip 240 B 243 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 34.1 kB 34.1 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.71 kB 1.71 kB N/A
Overall change 53 kB 53 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Overall change 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 512 B 510 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 343 B 342 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 1.84 kB 1.84 kB
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 265 B 265 B
head-HASH.js gzip 363 B 362 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 393 B 392 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.57 kB 4.57 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 268 B 268 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.35 kB 2.34 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 328 B 328 B
script-HASH.js gzip 397 B 397 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 323 B 326 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.59 kB 3.59 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 749 B 747 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
index.html gzip 522 B 521 B N/A
link.html gzip 538 B 535 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 518 B 518 B
Overall change 518 B 518 B
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 128 kB 128 kB N/A
page.js gzip 207 kB 207 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 671 B 668 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 31.2 kB 31.2 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 844 B 844 B
Overall change 844 B 844 B
Next Runtimes Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
274-experime...dev.js gzip 322 B 322 B
274.runtime.dev.js gzip 314 B 314 B
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 367 kB 369 kB ⚠️ +1.41 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 129 kB 129 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 142 kB 142 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 138 kB 138 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 355 kB 357 kB ⚠️ +1.43 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 126 kB 126 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 37.6 kB 37.6 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 39.2 kB 39.2 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.69 kB 9.69 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 11.6 kB 11.6 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.68 kB 9.68 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 27.5 kB 27.5 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 916 kB 916 kB
Overall change 2.46 MB 2.46 MB ⚠️ +2.83 kB
build cache
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack Change
0.pack gzip 2.1 MB 2.09 MB N/A
index.pack gzip 75.1 kB 74.7 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Diff details
Diff for main-HASH.js

Diff too large to display

Diff for app-page-exp..ntime.dev.js
failed to diff
Diff for app-page.runtime.dev.js
failed to diff
Commit: 7704012

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 22:27
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 17a0c3b to ff7bc1d Compare January 9, 2025 04:47
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 8c450e6 to 44937e8 Compare January 9, 2025 04:47
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from ff7bc1d to 8ca28ed Compare January 9, 2025 07:24
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 44937e8 to 95a41b2 Compare January 9, 2025 07:25
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 8ca28ed to 9c0f59f Compare January 9, 2025 09:40
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 95a41b2 to baab20c Compare January 9, 2025 09:41
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 9c0f59f to 571776d Compare January 9, 2025 13:29
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from baab20c to 5e65707 Compare January 9, 2025 13:29
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 571776d to cd1026d Compare January 9, 2025 15:46
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 5e65707 to 80f0b0f Compare January 9, 2025 15:46
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from cd1026d to 7c3592c Compare January 10, 2025 06:56
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 80f0b0f to 6f128a6 Compare January 10, 2025 06:56
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 7c3592c to 3eed2c6 Compare January 10, 2025 08:13
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 6f128a6 to 55a52d7 Compare January 10, 2025 08:13
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 3eed2c6 to 1d49530 Compare January 10, 2025 08:37
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 55a52d7 to 2bd7bf5 Compare January 10, 2025 08:38
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 1d49530 to 676404c Compare January 10, 2025 08:44
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 2bd7bf5 to 1742596 Compare January 10, 2025 08:44
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 676404c to 9656b7f Compare January 10, 2025 08:53
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 1742596 to c4ff1a3 Compare January 10, 2025 08:53
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 9656b7f to f53a05b Compare January 10, 2025 09:04
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from c4ff1a3 to 38f19e5 Compare January 10, 2025 09:04
}, [frames, isIgnoreListOpen])

return (
<div className="error-overlay-call-stack-container">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we'd better give a nextjs prefix for our own components or use data-* attribute to separate them from user's css

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIK Shadow DOM encapsulates css

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But that's good idea, will follow up!

<path
fillRule="evenodd"
clipRule="evenodd"
d="M8.70722 2.39641C8.3167 2.00588 7.68353 2.00588 7.29301 2.39641L4.46978 5.21963L3.93945 5.74996L5.00011 6.81062L5.53044 6.28029L8.00011 3.81062L10.4698 6.28029L11.0001 6.81062L12.0608 5.74996L11.5304 5.21963L8.70722 2.39641ZM5.53044 9.71963L5.00011 9.1893L3.93945 10.25L4.46978 10.7803L7.29301 13.6035C7.68353 13.994 8.3167 13.994 8.70722 13.6035L11.5304 10.7803L12.0608 10.25L11.0001 9.1893L10.4698 9.71963L8.00011 12.1893L5.53044 9.71963Z"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not blocking but feels svg path can be optimized, can bypass some svg optimization tool before adding into code

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will follow up, thanks!

display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

few unnecessary line breaks?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are somewhat grouped, but I can just put them in one. Mind if I follow up?

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from f53a05b to 40ca927 Compare January 10, 2025 11:57
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 38f19e5 to f680559 Compare January 10, 2025 11:58
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 40ca927 to ad48eba Compare January 10, 2025 12:08
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch 2 times, most recently from f03e22e to 392ed35 Compare January 10, 2025 12:17
}

export const CALL_STACK_FRAME_STYLES = css`
div[data-nextjs-call-stack-frame] {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why we have div and button both are applied with [data-nextjs-call-stack-frame]

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When there is the source to open the editor, it should be clickable, so use the button.
When the button is used, the "text-dragging" experience is not great (maybe it's my CSS skill issue).
So if it is unclickable, used div to preserve the text-dragging experience.

CleanShot.2025-01-09.at.06.52.55.mp4

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use div, and to not open the editor it can be controlled by classname and a early break in onClick handler. having different element to vary the behavior is tricky

@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 669a4a0 to 10c4476 Compare January 10, 2025 12:32
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 392ed35 to 739008d Compare January 10, 2025 12:33
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-08-_devoverlay_apply_turbopack_styling branch from 10c4476 to 8eb0b85 Compare January 10, 2025 13:11
@devjiwonchoi devjiwonchoi force-pushed the 01-09-_devoverlay_add_call_stack branch from 739008d to 7704012 Compare January 10, 2025 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants