Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

multibody: Install benchmarks models; deprecate redundant Acrobot models #11011

Conversation

EricCousineau-TRI
Copy link
Contributor

@EricCousineau-TRI EricCousineau-TRI commented Mar 25, 2019

Towards #11009
Towards #5408 (in that we don't have to keep the examples files in sync if they don't exist)


This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor Author

@EricCousineau-TRI EricCousineau-TRI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+@RussTedrake for feature review for //examples; see #5408 + #10294 + #11009 for discussion.
(I want to consolidate these issues, but they all touch on different areas...)

\cc @jwnimmer-tri

Reviewable status: all discussions resolved, LGTM missing from assignee russtedrake, platform LGTM missing (waiting on @RussTedrake)

@EricCousineau-TRI EricCousineau-TRI changed the title multibody: Install benchmarks models multibody: Install benchmarks models; deprecate redundant Acrobot models Mar 25, 2019
Copy link
Member

@sherm1 sherm1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 1 unresolved discussion, LGTM missing from assignee russtedrake, platform LGTM missing (waiting on @EricCousineau-TRI and @RussTedrake)


examples/acrobot/Acrobot.sdf, line 4 at r1 (raw file):

<sdf version='1.5'>
  <!-- DEPRECATED: This model will be removed on 2019-06-01. Please use
  `multibody/bencmarks/acrobot/acrobot.sdf instead. -->

nit bencmarks -> benchmarks (in several places)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@EricCousineau-TRI EricCousineau-TRI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 2 unresolved discussions, LGTM missing from assignee russtedrake, platform LGTM missing (waiting on @EricCousineau-TRI and @RussTedrake)

a discussion (no related file):
Pending discussion in #5408 on how to de-duplicate code + data among //examples + //multibody/benchmarks:
#10294 (comment)


Copy link
Contributor

@RussTedrake RussTedrake left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is one deletion, one deprecation message, and the addition of a lot of TODOs. fine for me.
:LGTM:

Reviewed 14 of 14 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 2 unresolved discussions, platform LGTM from [russtedrake] (waiting on @EricCousineau-TRI)

@jwnimmer-tri
Copy link
Collaborator

Happy New Year, and thanks for your interest in contributing to Drake! Since this PR has not received any updates over the past 6+ months, we are closing it automatically. To resume the PR again, you may reopen it with updates, or open a new one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants