Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(transformer/class-properties): support private_fields_as_properties assumption #7717

Conversation

overlookmotel
Copy link
Contributor

@overlookmotel overlookmotel commented Dec 7, 2024

Support private_fields_as_properties assumption in class properties transform. This assumption is also enabled by the transform's loose option.

Optional chain (e.g. this?.#prop) is not yet implemented, but all other usages of private fields are supported. We'll handle optional chain in a follow-on PR.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 7, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #7717 will not alter performance

Comparing 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption (2e69720) with 12-09-refactor_traverse_remove_traversectx_is_static_ (5d6fa25)

Summary

✅ 29 untouched benchmarks

@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 12-07-refactor_transformer_class-properties_rename_classpropertiesoptions_loose_ branch from 75bb582 to 9dd0e00 Compare December 7, 2024 19:00
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch 2 times, most recently from 1061ad5 to f30ed2e Compare December 7, 2024 20:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-ast Area - AST label Dec 7, 2024
@Dunqing Dunqing changed the base branch from 12-07-refactor_transformer_class-properties_rename_classpropertiesoptions_loose_ to graphite-base/7717 December 8, 2024 01:47
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the graphite-base/7717 branch from 9dd0e00 to 5913200 Compare December 8, 2024 02:21
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch from f30ed2e to 04ec66b Compare December 8, 2024 02:21
@Dunqing Dunqing changed the base branch from graphite-base/7717 to main December 8, 2024 02:22
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch from 04ec66b to 0fe9a92 Compare December 8, 2024 02:22
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch 3 times, most recently from b1c4455 to c84661f Compare December 8, 2024 13:38
@overlookmotel overlookmotel changed the base branch from main to 12-08-test_transformer_class-properties_override_test_outputfor__super_in_class_constructor December 8, 2024 13:38
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch from 70958f5 to 0078e41 Compare December 9, 2024 14:23
@overlookmotel overlookmotel changed the base branch from graphite-base/7717 to main December 9, 2024 14:24
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch 2 times, most recently from 3d56895 to 9093083 Compare December 10, 2024 00:34
@overlookmotel overlookmotel changed the base branch from main to 12-09-refactor_traverse_remove_traversectx_is_static_ December 10, 2024 00:34
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch 3 times, most recently from 61578fd to d403aa2 Compare December 10, 2024 01:02
@overlookmotel overlookmotel marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 01:03
@Dunqing Dunqing added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Dec 10, 2024
Copy link
Member

Dunqing commented Dec 10, 2024

Merge activity

  • Dec 9, 9:27 PM EST: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Dec 9, 9:27 PM EST: A user added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Dec 9, 10:15 PM EST: A user merged this pull request with the Graphite merge queue.

…ties` assumption (#7717)

Support `private_fields_as_properties` assumption in class properties transform. This assumption is also enabled by the transform's `loose` option.

Optional chain (e.g. `this?.#prop`) is not yet implemented, but all other usages of private fields are supported. We'll handle optional chain in a follow-on PR.
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 12-09-refactor_traverse_remove_traversectx_is_static_ branch from 2bcaebc to 5d6fa25 Compare December 10, 2024 02:32
@Dunqing Dunqing requested a review from Boshen as a code owner December 10, 2024 02:32
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch from d403aa2 to 2e69720 Compare December 10, 2024 02:33
Base automatically changed from 12-09-refactor_traverse_remove_traversectx_is_static_ to main December 10, 2024 03:12
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 2e69720 into main Dec 10, 2024
29 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 12-07-feat_transformer_class-properties_support_private_fields_as_properties_assumption branch December 10, 2024 03:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue A-ast Area - AST A-transformer Area - Transformer / Transpiler C-enhancement Category - New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants