-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 485
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(transformer/class-properties): support private_fields_as_properties
assumption
#7717
feat(transformer/class-properties): support private_fields_as_properties
assumption
#7717
Conversation
Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into mainAdd the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix. You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #7717 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
75bb582
to
9dd0e00
Compare
1061ad5
to
f30ed2e
Compare
9dd0e00
to
5913200
Compare
f30ed2e
to
04ec66b
Compare
04ec66b
to
0fe9a92
Compare
b1c4455
to
c84661f
Compare
70958f5
to
0078e41
Compare
a61e9be
to
97acd88
Compare
3d56895
to
9093083
Compare
61578fd
to
d403aa2
Compare
Merge activity
|
…ties` assumption (#7717) Support `private_fields_as_properties` assumption in class properties transform. This assumption is also enabled by the transform's `loose` option. Optional chain (e.g. `this?.#prop`) is not yet implemented, but all other usages of private fields are supported. We'll handle optional chain in a follow-on PR.
2bcaebc
to
5d6fa25
Compare
d403aa2
to
2e69720
Compare
Support
private_fields_as_properties
assumption in class properties transform. This assumption is also enabled by the transform'sloose
option.Optional chain (e.g.
this?.#prop
) is not yet implemented, but all other usages of private fields are supported. We'll handle optional chain in a follow-on PR.